Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Economic Armageddon Narrowly Averted According to Dem Rep

I think I found the original version of this clip via a Tweet from theeconomysucks but what it talks about is pretty damn newsworthy and I'm a little surprised that it didn't merit some sort of mention in the American mainstream media when the event occurred. Essentially, Pennsylvania Democrat, House Representative Paul Kanjorski tells C-SPAN, on February 6, 2009, that, last September (2008) he and other reps were told by the Fed that the world was a single day away from a total and complete economic meltdown.

I'm not kidding.

The original video, which I found here: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ca2_1234032281 but can also be found on YouTube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NMu1mFao3w , ends up being much longer than I think it needs to be to get the point across, so here is the important 1m37s where Kanjorski explains what happened.



In case there's anything funky with that video player, you can also watch an mp4 version of it or download it here and the original clip, also converted to mp4, is here.

Let me nutshell it. According to Kanjorski:

1) The was an electronic run on money market accounts on the morning of September 18, 2008.

2) The Fed watched as $550 billion was pulled from these accounts.

3) The Treasury "opened up its window" and "pumped $105 billion in the system and quickly realized they could not stem the tide."

(I'm not sure what point 3 literally means, but that's what he said.)

4) They then closed down the accounts, stopping any more money to be removed and then upped the FDIC limit to $250,000. Yeah--this is why they did that. I saw it in the news back then and wondered why that was specifically done.

5) If they hadn't acted as soon as they did, the Fed told the House reps that $5.5 trillion would have been removed from the US economy by 2pm that afternoon. The conclusion the Fed reached at that point was that the US economy would have faced a complete crash and would have taken the world economy with it within a day.

According to Kanjorksi, they felt that if that had happened it would have been "the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it."

Missed it by THAT much!

Oh, I kid the end of the civilized world, but I love it!

Joking aside, it's pretty damn scary that we came this close to economic apocalypse and no one seems to have reported on it in the news. Apparently, it's all over the blogosphere now, but the only thing I found on it that was more than a WTF post (like mine is) was a post at BaltimoreChronicle.com which seems more concerned with corruption than the fact that the economy almost evaporated last year.

There's also a transcript for the February 10, 2009 (yesterday) episode of Countdown that you can read which also talks about this story, but it doesn't go into much depth. It just reassures us and blah-blah-blah. What it completely fails to do is really explain why this "electronic run on the banks" happened, how it could happen to the tune of $5.5 trillion and why the hell this wasn't major goddamn news across the world. It also fails to give us a legitimate reason to trust that it won't happen again.

Let me put it simply: if the US Treasury Department hadn't upped the FDIC limit to $250,000, the economy wouldn't be here today.

The really scary thing is that all the Treasury had to do was SAY something that sounded good to people. It doesn't appear to me that anyone in government or at the Fed is doing anything differently due to the economy almost melting down.

There's something seriously wrong with that.

UPDATE 4:34pm: found a post at fool.com about this from two days ago that calls the date of Kanjorski's comments on C-SPAN to be January 28, 2009. That post is also an interesting read, though doesn't tell us anything new at this point.

3 comments:

  1. Never happened. Boy, you'll believe anything if it shines bad on the US: http://tinyurl.com/agdsvz

    I have a bridge for sale not far from where you live.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tee-hee.

    You crack me up.

    Do you have a life? Your own blog, perhaps?

    Hm, guess it's "no" on both.

    Wait--so, you're telling me, we should trust some blogger over at Conde Nast to get it right and we should NOT trust an elected leader?

    Boy, you'll believe anything you see on the Internet.

    And FYI, I don't believe anything if it shines badly on the US--I believe very little actually. I repeat what I think bears repeating and all that blog post that you linked to proves is that another politician is not trustworthy. Or, it could be that the blogger wasn't in on the meeting that politician had with the Fed. Hm, THAT could be, too.

    See, if you *watch the actual video of the Congressman* you'll hear him explain *what he was told* by the Fed. Granted, I could have hit on that aspect more in my blog post, but you saying that it "never happened" because of something you read in one place on the Internet is laughable. I quoted an elected politician, not some guy paid to bring traffic to the Conde Nast website.

    As far as I can tell, even if your BFF over at Conde Nast is right, there's still not enough coverage about this story whether it happened or not.

    Oh and whut hppnd to UR cute lolspeak? Get as tired for you as it is to everyone else?

    Oh and by the way, this is the last time I reply to any comment you leave for any of my posts. If all you're going to do is point and call names and be generally antagonistic, you're not helping the discussion. I might even moderate your comments into oblivion. It's my site after all.

    Don't like it? Get your own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And you believe the Fed? You believe congressmen? You believe that $500 bil can go missing and no one notices it?

    Forget Christianity, you have a pretty interesting "belief" system worked out for yourself!

    All you do is point and call names and be generally antagonistic. Sure, it's your blog, but it's our internets. Maybe I'll start a "ThePete is a Bonehead" blog.

    4 r34lz LOL!!!1!1!!1!1111!

    ReplyDelete