Monday, July 19, 2004

KING ARTHUR (2004)

King Arthur (Unrated Widescreen Director's Cut)Entertaining? Sure, but it's nothing that will go down in history as a great film.
Technically any good? It's fine, but don't expect anything true to the classic Arthurian legends. The script is supposed to be based on "new archeological evidence." To me, it just seems like they wanted to change the story around and did it in a way not terribly interesting. Not a whole lot of character development, but the acting was ok. I found it predictable and cliche in a lot of places.
How did I feel as the credits rolled? Unimpressed. This is the producer Bruckheimer's best film yet, but that's not saying much. It's bland and unmemorable, but a good matinee movie. But I'd rent the movie.
Final Rating? RTV

No comments:

Post a Comment