Monday, August 16, 2010

Gah! This OneHelloWorld post made me cry… feelings!! MUST… SUPPRESS… FEELINGS!!! From glasgow-effect: ONE HELLO WORLD - Such A Better Place Leave a voicemail and OneHelloWorld will write music behind your narrative. Call it a soundtrack to your thoughts. Call (direct to voicemail): +1 (316) 247-0421. No emotions, we discussed that!! SIGH… OK, I feel better… er, I feel less emotional… aka better… This one was pretty good, too: 198 Plays I’m sorry mom, I don’t believe onehelloworld: Our conversation made me realize I’m not bitter, terrible, awful or a menace for having these views. No you’re not. Hope you get that welcome at home you deserve. Thanks for relaying the experience. Leave OneHelloWorld a voicemail and they will write music behind your narrative. Call it a soundtrack to your thoughts. Call (direct to voicemail): +1 (316) 247-0421 Wow. Fantastic stuff. Link of the day… via contrararian.tumblr.com OneHelloWorld sounds like a brilliant idea, though I’m nervous to check out the site since I know I’ll just sit there and listen to it all day.

Gah!  This OneHelloWorld post made me cry… feelings!!  MUST… SUPPRESS… FEELINGS!!!


From glasgow-effect:



ONE HELLO WORLD - Such A Better Place


Leave a voicemail and OneHelloWorld will write music behind your narrative. Call it a soundtrack to your thoughts. Call (direct to voicemail): +1 (316) 247-0421.



No emotions, we discussed that!!


SIGH… OK, I feel better… er, I feel less emotional… aka better…


This one was pretty good, too:



 


198 Plays


I’m sorry mom, I don’t believe


onehelloworld:




Our conversation made me realize I’m not bitter, terrible, awful or a menace for having these views.



No you’re not. Hope you get that welcome at home you deserve. Thanks for relaying the experience.



Leave OneHelloWorld a voicemail and they will write music behind your narrative. Call it a soundtrack to your thoughts. Call (direct to voicemail):  +1 (316) 247-0421


Wow. Fantastic stuff. Link of the day…



via contrararian.tumblr.com


OneHelloWorld sounds like a brilliant idea, though I’m nervous to check out the site since I know I’ll just sit there and listen to it all day.



Absurd Disconnect much?


From coalspeaker:



President Obama attemps to convince everyone it’s safe to swim in the Gulf by not swimming in the Gulf but kind of pretending he did..



But, as the article Coalspeaker links to reports:


Yet it soon emerged that the private beach on which it was taken, off Alligator Point in St Andrew Bay, north-west Florida, isn’t technically in the gulf.

via independent.co.uk


COUGHliarCOUGH


And here’s another gem from CoalSpeaker:



Tell us what you NOAA


Now we knowa this: Seafood from the Gulf not being tested for dispersants..



via coalspeaker.com


Yummy!  Coalspeaker links to a C-SPAN video that features Lisa Jackson, head of the EPA, and Larry Robinson, the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), testifying on the Hill about the use of dispersants in response to the BP Oil Disaster.


I’m sure we can trust BP and our government 100% that dispersants aren’t bad for our health!





…we’re all gonna die!

The Absurd Disconnect Continues: noticing greedy employers

If you’re not familiar with what I call “the Absurd Disconnect,” in a nutshell, it’s when people look at the sky and tell you it’s green—or when someone tells you it’s safe to go swimming in a part of the ocean that just had millions of gallons of oil dumped in it—like that.  There’s been a lot of this kind of thing going on lately and it’s continuing.


In this instance, I saw a link on Newsweek’s Tumblr to an article on Newsweek’s main site claiming to be “What the JetBlue Guy Says About the Economy” well, it wasn’t that. I was hoping to literally hear Slater’s take on the job situation, but alas, I got some reporter-guy’s opinion of it. Part of his opinion was based on USG docs.  Yeah, yeah, let’s trust USG docs.  They’ve never been wrong before.  Anyway, so here’s the part of the article that pissed me off the most (italics are mine):


For the past year, the U.S. economy has been whipping roughly the same number of workers to do more, produce more, serve more, with each passing week, without much assistance, and without much of a raise. Over the past four quarters, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported, “unit labor costs fell 2.8 percent as output per hour increased faster than hourly compensation.” But when the BLS reported the second-quarter productivity numbers on Tuesday, Aug. 10, the results were a little shocking. For the first time in several years, productivity actually fell—at a 0.9 percent annual rate. Workers put in more hours, but output didn’t keep up. They simply can’t run any faster.

via newsweek.com


OH, REALLY? Just the past year?


Since college, I can’t name a single boss I’ve ever worked for who didn’t hire me for one thing who didn’t then pile on extra responsibilities.  Sometimes those responsibilities were tenuously related to the work I was paid to do (so I dealt with them) but *every* time I didn’t get a raise to make up for the extra work.  I finished college in the early 90s, right when the downsizing trend was kicking into high gear.  Shortly thereafter, it stopped being a trend and became business as usual.


Seems like some folks never noticed that. I remember Paul Krugman, not too long ago, saying something about how he was worried high unemployment would stop getting apologized for and would just be assumed to be part of the system.  He hadn’t noticed that it’s already part of the system. But that’s what he gets for being one of those people that base their reality almost entirely on what they are told by “authorities” and not what they’ve experienced or heard from other “grunts.” 


I worked for a company from 1999 to 2006 and held two positions. In that time, the first position never saw a raise. Not for the 7 years I worked there.  In the other position I only got a 75¢/hr raise after I demanded $1/hr.  This was after they tried to get me to become the receptionist for the entire company, sort the company’s mail AND do my original job of running my department (which was something I did only because my boss, the actual head of the department, wasn’t doing it).


That’s just one example. 


It’s amazing to see the media just now catching on that employers are greedy.  What’s next? Choice words for executives for this “new trend” of owning expensive luxury cars and wearing expensive suits?


Yes, that op-ed will no doubt be written by Sherlock Holmes—for only someone as brilliant as the fictional detective would be able to make such profound observations on humanity today.


>_<


Why is the media so slow to do it’s job?  Why are we so willing to put up with being shit on by our bosses?  The last time I had an office job where my boss tried to dump more duties on me, I put my foot down and they survived without me having to do work I didn’t sign up to do.  The work I was not willing to do was absorbed by other employees whose job it already was.  Later they laid me off when all of my duties got folded into other folks’ jobs (d’oh!).  They offered to hire me elsewhere in the company but couldn’t tell me how much more I’d be making but that I’d be working directly for the top executives at the company.  Bleh—not for me.  So, I turned it down.  Turns out the woman who got the job ended up being forced to work 6 days a week without OT. Yep. She felt compelled to not risk the gig because she was a single mom. 


This was three years ago—before the recession.


Well, it was before the officially recognized recession, anyway.


That’s the other falsehood that the media and other “authority” types haven’t noticed yet.  Thanks to a number of factors, our economy is on a downward trajectory and has been for some time.  It was just easier to ignore before.


Shame we can’t all just face reality and do something about it.


What are those factors?


Outsourcing


Offshoring


a money system not based on anything tangible


lousy regulation


corporations having the “right” to “give” as much as they want to campaigns


These five factors, I believe, are behind every problem facing America, and the western world, really.

New footage from the original Star Wars Trilogy? WHO CARES? Show me New Prequel Footage! (6hrs worth!)

I would like to see new footage from the Prequel Trilogy!!  You know, footage that would make it SUCK LESS.

Come on, George!!  You keep trotting out your old cash cow every year with new, cheesy gimmicks spun from 30+ year-old good ideas.

WHO CARES ABOUT DELETED SCENES FROM THE ORIGINAL STAR WARS???  Seriously—Luke Skywalker activating his lightsaber in a cave??  Dude—I’ve read Campbell, that’s just a metaphor for masturbation!!

I don’t want to see Luke alone in a cave with his saber!!

What do I want to see?

New footage for the Prequel Trilogy.

In fact, I’d like to see at least SIX HOURS OF NEW FOOTAGE FROM THE PREQUEL TRILOGY!!!

OR MORE.

Come on, George!!  You want to make EVEN MORE money off of us suckers fans?

MAKE A NEW PREQUEL TRILOGY!!

You could call it a “Director’s Master Cut” and pretend it’s the same trilogy of movies but with LOTS of new footage!  Lots of new footage you just shot with new actors and new script pages you “found” laying around the back of your brain!

COME ON, GEORGE! DON’T YOU WANT MORE MONEY??? (And wouldn’t we all like to see a second try?)

Sunday, August 15, 2010

It’s the Conspiracies Episode of the 666cast! Ep 19—are conspiracies real? Here’s my take! Please subscribe to the feed.

It’s the Conspiracies Episode of the 666cast! Ep 19—are conspiracies real? Here’s my take!


Please subscribe to the feed.

Fat Man and Little Boy not "the Bombs" we think they were? Seems so. (More fodder against atom bombs ending WWII)

Two Fridays ago, I wrote about how and why the atom bombs dropped on Japan were not justified acts.  The arguments I included in that post were moral ones.  What follows are factual arguments against the conclusions that the bombs ended the war at all.  Today I came across an article from the AP that reports on a new book detailing a tremendous Russian presence that seems to have had a far greater effect on Japan than the bombs, believe it or not:



Historians rethink key Soviet role in Japan defeat
By SLOBODAN LEKIC (AP)

As the United States dropped its atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, 1.6 million Soviet troops launched a surprise attack on the Japanese army occupying eastern Asia. Within days, Emperor Hirohito’s million-man army in the region had collapsed.



But following the German surrender on May 8, 1945, and having suffered a string of defeats in the Philippines, Okinawa and Iwo Jima, Japan turned to Moscow to mediate an end to the Pacific war.

However, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin had already secretly promised Washington and London that he would attack Japan within three months of Germany’s defeat. He thus ignored Tokyo’s plea, and mobilized more than a million troops along Manchuria’s border.

Operation August Storm was launched Aug. 9, 1945, as the Nagasaki bomb was dropped, and would claim the lives of 84,000 Japanese and 12,000 Soviet soldiers in two weeks of fighting. The Soviets ended up just 50 kilometers (30 miles) from Japan’s main northern island, Hokkaido.



I’ve never heard of Soviet troops being so numerous or so close to Japan.  30 miles is nothing—that’s practically a walk from my apartment in Washington Heights down to Wall Street and back.  The NYC subway would let me make the journey in two hours.


So, that’s how close they were to invading Japan (yes, I know the A Train doesn’t travel between Gornozavodsk and Hokkaido, but you get the point).


On top of that, there’s the part where in May, 1945, Japan tried to talk peace with Russia.  They were interested in an end to the fighting two months before and if Stalin had been more interested in peace, perhaps the end of the war would look very different to us now.


Regardless, this is proof that the atom bombs were not necessary to ending the war. Plain and simple.

Can we please BAN the use of relative dates? They seem entirely use-free to me.

You know what I mean, right?  It’s when, instead of a date/time-stamp on a blog post or article it says “3 hours ago” or worse “3 months ago”.  It’s useless in so many ways and I’ve never heard an argument for the use of relative dates.

“They’re perfect for people who don’t really care when something was posted!”

“Relative dating, for when specificity doesn’t matter!”

“Who wants a cold, in humanly precise date and time on an Internet post? Give me warm, human vagueness any day!”

I’ve tried really hard to come up with a good reason for relative dating to be better than absolute dating.

Isn’t it ridiculous that we even have a phrase for that?  “Absolute dating.”  Funny how that just refers to “putting the actual date down.”

Imagine if we tried to use relative dating on formal documents.  You sign your tax return “4 months ago.”

I guess you can avoid being late that way.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

#WTFObama: Does Obama (or any other politician) Know How They Look to US (or care)?


I’ve been wondering for years how Republicans can be the way they are so shamelessly.  These so-called “Christians” who hate gays and think invading countries is a good thing, being so incredibly, amorally pro-business, and now going on about responsible spending after 8 years of two wars and an absurd expansion of government the likes of which we never saw during all of the Cold War—not one of them seems to understand how horrible they’ve made themselves look. 


Before Obama was in office, it was hard to tell if the Democrats were the same way.  They always said that they were against torture, that they’d be transparent, and all that, but since Obama took office, we’ve seen just how shameless the Democrats are, as well.  Why is no one from BP, Transocean or Haliburton in jail after the BP Oil Disaster?  Hell, the USG, itself, was negligent in the disaster, too—I thought the Dems were going to deliver accountability.  And now, Obama has his “Ground Zero/the Air is Safe To Breathe” moment by saying the water in the Gulf of Mexico is safe to swim in.  Then how come we can’t watch you go in?


This isn’t about your privacy—this isn’t about you getting a day off.  This is about you proving to us that you aren’t lying to us.  See, because you told us offshore drilling in the Gulf was going to be cool.  You also told us you’d close Gitmo.  OH and you think it’s OK to detain people indefinitely and then there’s that American citizen you think it’s cool to assassinate if you have the chance. (Read more about some of this here.)



Who do any of these lying leaders think they’re fooling?



Screengrab source.

Suck on this, Solar Naysayers: Solar is now Cheaper and more Efficient

Solar is now cheaper than nukes:



Solar Power Is Cheaper Than Nuclear for the First Time
by Cameron Scott, 07/29/10
filed under: Renewable Energy, Solar Power

solar power, solar energy, solar technologies, nuclear power, nuclear energy, energy costs, duke university, renewable energy

Here’s bright spot in the news of the day: energy from new solar installations has, for the first time, become cheaper than energy from new nuclear plants, according to a new Duke University study. Thanks to cost-saving technologies and economies of scale, price can no longer be an excuse to invest in nuclear power rather than solar.



Solar power efficiency may double:



Photon enhanced thermionic emission could double efficiency of solar cells
By Laura June posted Aug 3rd 2010 8:25PM

Engineers at Stanford have developed a process which can harness the light and heat of the sun simultaneously, which could lead to solar cells that are twice as efficient as those currently available. Called photon enhanced thermionic emission — or PETE for short — the process differs from traditional cells which lose efficiency as temperatures rise, and the materials needed to build the cells are cheap and widely available.



Heeeey, I should demand a royalty! That’s my name, too!!


Harharhar.



The point here is that solar is making headway.  In fact, this also supports my theory that if we’d only been supporting solar all this time, we’d be even further along on the path to using solar power regularly, even commonly.


But NOOOOO, whiner solar naysayers have to climb up the butts of traditional power companies and cling desperately to old technology, rather than trying innovate.  Essentially, anyone who discourages development of solar energy is anti-innovation.  Any excuse to NOT try to use the power of sun to provide energy for our lives is absurd.  Any problems we’ll run into we’ll surmount.  Simple as that.

Friday, August 13, 2010

The Absurd Disconnect: Global Warming Edition

Back on August 2nd, I posted about how America imprisons 1% of it’s citizens while leaving another 10% of them unemployed and commented that the rhetoric promising to end this situation is just that, rhetoric—not actual promises to change things.  This morning I came across “Why Even Bother With Science?” from underpaidgenius:




Tom Toles, Friday Rant — Heat Exhaustion Version


This will be my last rant about the climate. Cartoonists sometimes look just like the archetypical cartoon character crawling across the desert. Gary Larson did a cartoon about two guys crawling across a desert, dying of thirst. They have come upon a drinking fountain. One is letting it run without drinking and saying he’s going to let it run until it gets cold. That’s about as sensible as the debate on climate change.


We are apparently going to let the debate on the science run until hell freezes over. If you can’t accept the conclusions of 98 percent of the scientists whose FIELD IT IS, then why even bother with science? If that high a percentage of field of study is to be discounted ENTIRELY, then we are in deep trouble, which, of course, we are. It would be so simple if it were just a matter of ignoring the yelping commenters hereabouts: “Move on, Mr. Cartoonist! Chill out Tommy! There are more important things to worry about!”


Really? Which would those things be? This may be the only political issue whose results could be catastrophic PERMANENTLY. But the deliberate dust storm thrown up by fossil-fuel-centric interests has succeeded in contaminating and paralyzing the American response. Quite a victory for the deniers! It looks like mass-suicide to me. And so, my final rant on climate. Except not really. There has to be a drinking fountain out there somewhere.




In the latest edition, episode 18, of the 666cast, I talk about “The Absurd Disconnect”.  This is what I call the difference between our beliefs and our reality.  Tom Toles provides a wonderful example of this kind of thing in action—we see the reality but we refuse to accept it.  Paul Krugman in my above linked post from August 2 also provided a great example, though, unlike Toles, was unaware he was doing it.  In that post, I suggest Krugman should wake up and smell the bullshit he still believes is honesty from our leaders. To Toles, I say: you SHOULD chill out, but not because there are more important things to worry about, but because humanity isn’t doing a great job of paying attention to the threats facing them.  The more upset you get, the more crazy people will think you are—even if you have the facts to back you up.  That’s The Absurd Disconnect.


What’s really sad and frustrating is that there’s not a whole lot that seems to be effective in changing the minds of enough people to make a difference.  When given the choice, most folks seem to choose the more fearful path over the logical one, even if the logical one is easier (like hating gays—isn’t just easier to leave them alone?)


Of course, people like Toles and Krugman being worried that things are going to get worse, even though things are already worse, is just another example of The Absurd Disconnect—where the symptoms you’re concerned will appear at some point in the future are erupting all around you but you just choose to ignore them.


In the end, a lot of what we criticize about our leaders and ourselves has become, for me, one giant “DUH!” moment.  I look backward at the last 400 years (essentially, since the invention of the first immortal corporation) and see the logical end game of capitalism/free market/the greed-is-good mentality.


I also see a world too bamboozled, too willingly distracted by their own greed, to change this path that humanity is on.


But no need to despair! Take a lesson from Hollywood actor, Slim Pickens (ironic name!):