The General Accounting Office has deemed the Bush administration's videotapes about Medicare propaganda and illegal, the New York Times said.
The investigative arm of Congress said the videos were a form of "covert propaganda" because the government was not identified as the source of the materials, which were broadcast by at least 40 television stations in 33 markets.
William Pierce, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, which helped develop the videos, said the tapes were not covert.
"TV stations knew the videos came from us and could have identified the government as the source if they had wanted to."
"And now message from the US Government that includes half-truths, omissions and outright lies. ENJOY!"
Read the UPI article for yourself over at the Washington Times website.
Read how I covered this story back in March of 2004.
From WashingtonTimes.com:
Ruling: Medicare video was propaganda
Washington, DC, May. 20 (UPI) -- The General Accounting Office has deemed the Bush administration's videotapes about Medicare propaganda and illegal, the New York Times said.
The investigative arm of Congress said the videos were a form of "covert propaganda" because the government was not identified as the source of the materials, which were broadcast by at least 40 television stations in 33 markets.
The GAO said a specific part of the videos, a made-for-television "story package," violated the prohibition on using taxpayer money for propaganda.
People seeing the videos in a newscast would "believe that the information came from a non-government source or neutral party," it said.
The accounting office said the videos were "not strictly factual news stories" and were flawed by "notable omissions and weaknesses" in their explanation of the Medicare law. But the main problem, it said, is that they were "misleading as to source."
William Pierce, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, which helped develop the videos, said the tapes were not covert.
"TV stations knew the videos came from us and could have identified the government as the source if they had wanted to."Copyright 2004 United Press International
No comments:
Post a Comment