Tuesday, February 7, 2006

OHIO ELECTION PROTECTION EXTRACTION

Some of you may remember [http://thepete.com/selection-fraud-fun-big-time/|back in 2004 when there were all sorts of questions about Ohio's sElection 2004 results]. Well, there will be no more questions about results in future Ohio elections because Republican politicians in the state have apparently performed serious surgery on election law there. Here's a clip from [http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0202-20.htm|a fairly opinionated article] at CommonDreams.Org and from FreePress.Org:
Ohio's GOP-controlled legislature has passed a repressive new law that will gut free elections here and is already surfacing elsewhere around the US. The bill will continue the process of installing the GOP as America's permanent ruling party.

Coming with the swearing in of right-wing extremist Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, it marks another dark day for what remains of American democracy.

Called HB3, the law now demands discriminatory voter ID, severely cripples the possibility of statewide recounts and actually ends the process of state-based challenges to federal elections---most importantly for president---held within the state.

In other words, the type of legal challenge mounted to the theft of Ohio's electoral votes in the 2004 election will now be all but impossible in the future.


I hate articles like this one because they are aso clearly opinionated, yet they do have important information buried in them. I'm sure these new laws are bad for democracy, but the article goes on to say:
Section 35-05.18 of HB3 requires restrictive identification requirements for anyone trying to vote in an Ohio election. Photo ID, a utility bill, a bank statement, a government check or other government document showing the name and current address of the voter will be required.


Why is this "restrictive"? I have to present a drivers license to buy something with my credit card, why is it so impossible to present one when I vote?

Nine paragraphs into the article we finally get to the proof in the pudding:
HB3 also ends the ability of the public to conduct meaningful audits of voting machines. Election protection activists recently forced the adoption of an auditable paper trail into the Ohio election process. In a state where virtually all ballots are cast and/or counted on electronic equipment, this cuts to the core of the ability to monitor an election's outcome. The new provision in HB3 will make the paper trail virtually meaningless.

HB3 further imposes a huge jump in the cost of forcing a recount. In 2004, the charge was $10 per precinct, with some 11,366 precincts in the state. Thus the Green and Libertarian Parties, which paid for it, had to pay somewhat more than $113,660. Now the charge will be $50 per precinct, jumping the charge to some $568,300.

Finally, and perhaps most astonishingly, HB3 eliminates the state statutes that have allowed citizens to challenge the outcome of federal elections within the state. After the 2004 election, election protection advocates filed a challenge to Bush's victory. Their attorneys were attacked with an official attempt to levy sanctions, and then were thwarted from an effective suit when GOP Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell locked up the state's voter records.


NOW we're talking! Clearly this is bad. When you can't audit an election it means it is that much easier to fix it. All you have to do is get away with it during the act--once the day is done and the ballots have been counted, there is no way to take a second look at the election.

This is it folks--our democracy is slowly falling apart, piece by piece.

No comments:

Post a Comment